FROM MY DESK

Big week on my side.

The first-ever Recruitment Mentors Podcast studio is almost ready to record in.

The set is built, and the kit is in, so all that’s left are the finishing touches.

Getting the wires off the floor and ordering some decent mugs, glasses and coasters.

Phase one is very much done, and I am buzzing to start interviewing in my very own space.

Let’s goooo! 🙏

What Didn’t Make This Week’s Episode

This week’s episode with Hugo focuses on three types of recruitment founders.

Hugo has been all three. He co-founded GQR in 2009 and scaled it to 300 people across offices in London, New York, Sydney, LA and Austin before exiting in 2023.

He now runs Talent Journey, which advises more than 100 recruitment businesses at every stage.

We didn’t get to the number Hugo uses to tell whether each one is doing well on the day of recording. He gave me all three in prep.

If you’re a profit maximiser founder type #1, the benchmark is around £1M of revenue per partner at a 70 to 80% margin.

That’s possible because the cost base is tiny. Tech and marketing come to 1 to 2% of revenue, and the highest cost is an offshore resourcing team, which Hugo says should be on commission.

If you’re a sustainable scaler founder type #2, he described what he calls a really nice business. Twelve people: two in ops and ten billers doing £2M at a 50% net margin.

That’s £1M profit, with around £60K going into a pension, £200K kept as reserve and £750K drawn by the founder. At £1M EBITDA, you’re also in the range where most deals happen, at four to five times.

If you’re an all-out scaler founder type #3, it’s the 40 rule, which is borrowed from tech. At Talent Journey, that means growing top-line GP by 40% a year while holding your margin.

Hit it, and you’re a good business.

The Debrief

Discipline beats talent in recruitment every day of the week.

Ask Hugo which market you should be in, and you won’t get the answer you’re hoping for.

Everyone wants to hear the US, data centres, or whatever the latest LinkedIn post says is printing money.

Hugo’s answer is that the best businesses he works with have one thing in common that isn’t their market. It’s discipline.

One of the strongest in his client portfolio, for example, places call centre staff, a market many would not view as ‘lucrative’.

Discipline underpins whether all three founder types succeed, and it matters just as much if you’re building a recruitment desk inside a company.

The clearest example is a SaaS recruiter who came to Talent Journey billing £300K. Charismatic and great with clients, but by Hugo’s account, really disorganised, and he wasn’t meeting anyone.

So the first KPI Hugo set him was to meet at least ten clients a month, including ones who weren’t hiring yet but would be. There was no new market and no new pitch.

He’s now at £600K. A meeting habit, plus an offshore resourcer to take candidate qualification off his plate, got him there.

Then there’s the part we didn’t have time for on the day of recording. In prep, I asked Hugo about his best billers at GQR.

❝

Were they five times better than the people billing £400K? “No, they were definitely not”

They were marginally better at everything, and more disciplined about doing it every single day. A 1% edge, repeated, compounds into a gap that looks like talent from the outside.

His own version of discipline isn’t glamorous.

Two hours of business development a day, split into two one-hour blocks, because half an hour isn’t long enough to build momentum.

That’s it: the non-negotiables he lived by during the workday, knowing they would lead to consistent performance.

This reminder resonated with me. As a solo founder, nobody holds you accountable, but a lot of us were trained in firms that handed us the strategy and told us to execute. That’s what makes those firms efficient.

But go out on your own, and that structure that made you successful can disappear overnight.

Or if you're building a desk right now, it’s easy to treat the structure as something done to you, when it’s actually what makes you great.

So whichever seat you’re in, the question isn’t whether you’re talented enough. It’s whether your week would hold up if nobody checked.

If it wouldn’t, fix that first. Not your market.

STEAL THIS

The 300 rule.

Hugo’s rule of thumb is that one person should cover no more than 300 hiring managers. The maths works like this.

Make 40 BD calls a day, and you’ll connect with around 10.

His ideal cadence is a meaningful conversation with every contact every six weeks, which is 30 working days.

Ten conversations a day for 30 days gives you 300. Go beyond that and relationships start going cold.

To use it this week, export your hiring manager list and count it.

If it’s well over 300, cut it to the 300 in the market you know best and park the rest.

Then give every call a reason other than “are you hiring?”

Bring something they’ll want to hear: what their closest competitors are doing, who’s moving, and where salaries are heading.

As Hugo puts it, a database of 5,000 hiring managers you never speak to is worthless.

LEAVE WITH THIS

❝

You don’t need to be five times better than everyone else. Just 1% better at everything, every day.

Keep smashing it & honing your craft!

Hishem x

Know a recruiter who needs to hear this? Send it their way.